November 2006

You are currently browsing the monthly archive for November 2006.

This blog, as it exists now, is about to be shuttered. I haven’t written much recently, and frankly, I don’t anticipate writing much more in a similar vein anytime soon. I originally thought this would be blog focused on law, or maybe food, but I feel like I need to try something new. So, soon I will be replacing the blog with something new. The old blog isn’t disappearing entirely; I am keeping copies of the database and other relevant files, so it may come back some day.

Six major airlines are set to announce iPod integration with the in-flight video display.

November 14, 2006 | No comments

A beautiful picture of the harvest moon.

November 14, 2006 | 1 comment

Big burger versus tiny burger.

November 14, 2006 | 1 comment

A burrito is not a sandwich. FYI.

November 13, 2006 | No comments

My First Day in Hell, by Jack Handey.

November 12, 2006 | No comments

Wines and Times. A Google Maps mashup for finding winery events, wine festivals, wine trail events, and winery hours.

November 12, 2006 | No comments

In Kansas v. Marsh, the Supreme Court split over an important issue sure to have repercussions in many future cases: does the possessive form of a singular noun ending with the letter s require an additional s after the apostrophe? LegalTimes.com reports:

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the Court (and joined by Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justices Samuel Alito Jr., Anthony Kennedy, and Antonin Scalia), concluded that the Kansas statute was not unconstitutional. In reaching this conclusion, Thomas repeatedly referred to the relevant law as Kansas’ statute. In response, Justice David Souter wrote a dissent that was joined by Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and John Paul Stevens. The dissent revealed Souter’s bitter disagreement with both the substantive conclusion of the majority and the grammatical philosophy of the opinion’s author. Whereas Thomas apparently believes that whenever a singular noun ends in s, an additional s should never be placed after the apostrophe, Souter has made equally clear his conviction that an s should always be added after the apostrophe when forming a singular possessive, regardless of whether the nonpossessive form already ends in s.

It’s not surprising that lawyers so often disagree over grammar and usage, given that most lawyers spend a large portion of their working days writing. What is surprising, perhaps, is that those disagreement are often quite vociferous. For example, one partner for whom I work insists on a number of grammatical and typographical idiosyncrasies, such as requiring two spaces after a period, or the use of a double dash with a space on either side instead of an m-dash.

Shadows of Lives and Loss: Decaying Memories Along the Gulf Coast. Extreme HDR photographs of the Katrina aftermath by Dan Burkholder. More at the Vancouver Gallery of Photography.

November 12, 2006 | No comments

Ruben’s Tube. Now this would make a great pyrotechnic for a rock show.

November 12, 2006 | No comments

« Older entries